Yeah, I thinkꦆ EA/BioWare just wanted a "win". With a game that isn't terrible, but was never go🧜ing to be a masterpiece either, and I think they hedged their bets and managed to keep BioWare as a still valuable piece of EA's portfolio.

I admit that when the game was announced I was hoping for a gr🙈ittier, darker narrative🐠, and from what I'm hearing from Reviewers, this doesn't seem to be the case.

I guess I should've expected that when it was revealed that Blood Mage was no longer an option due to so🍷me narrative decisions the studio made, which is a disappointment considering the opening takes place in Tevinter.

I think iওt's safe to say that the game is good for what it is - but not in the way older fans may have hoped - and that's okay.

It is meant to appeal t🐲oജ a different, larger, audience, and I think they did just that.

Let me preface this by saying I don't eꦗven enjoy ꦗUbisoft games. I haven't bought any of their products since Rainbow 6 Siege and even that was disappointing to me.

But yeah, the more I read about the "backlash" against this game, theꦇ more I realize just how ridiculous people can be.

All of this infantile internet screeching at Ubisoft's choice of charact🐭ers is actually quite hilarious to observe!

Assassin's Creed is the sa📖me franchise in꧙ which you could:

- Utilize the "Animus" to experience the "Genetic Memorꦜy" of your Ancestors (Totally real♕istic)

- Discover a highly advanced "Precursor" species behind𝔍 the creation of the "Pieces of Eden" wh꧒o used Humans as a laborforce (lmao)

- Learn that the "Templar Order", whose members include Cain (From the actual Biblical stories) ancient Egyptians, Greeks, ౠPersians, Romans, and more throughout history (Okay buddy⛄)

But ♉the story of Yasuke is where Ub💎isoft has taken things too far???

Yeah, I'm thinking it's not "Historical✃ A🌞ccuracy" that's the problem here roflmao