Yeah, I think EA/BioWare ꧋just wanted a "win". With a game that isn't terrible, but was never going to be a masterpiece either, and I think they hedged their bets and managed to keep BioWare as a still val💦uable piece of EA's portfolio.

I admit that when the 🅘game was announced I was hoping for a grittier, darker narrative, and from what I'm hearing from Reviewers, this doesn't seem to be t🦋he case.

I guess I should've expected that when it was revealed that Blood Mage was no longer an option due to some narrative decisions the studio made, which is a disappointment consideringಌ the opening takes place in Tevinter.

I think it's 🍒safe to say that the game is good for what it is - but not in the way older fans may have hoped 𒆙- and that's okay.

It🎉 is meant to appeal to a different, larger, audience, and I think they did just that.

Let me preface this by saying I don't ♛even enjoy Ubisoft games. I haven't bought any of their products since Rainbow 6 Siege and even that was disappointing to me.

But yeah, the more I read about the "backlash" against th🌱is game, the more I realize just how ridiculous people can be.

All of this infantile inter🦄net screeching at Ubisoft's choice of characters is actually quite hilarious to observe!

Assassin's Creed is the 🔥same f൩ranchise in which you could:

- Utilize the "Animus" to experience the "Genetic Me𒈔mory" of your Ancestors (Totally real🥃istic)

- Discover a ꦗhighly advanced "Precursor" species behind the creation of the "Pieces of Eden" who used Humans as a laborforce (lmao)

- Learn that the "Templar Order", whose 🐻members include Cain (From the actual Biblical stories) ancient Egyptians, Greeks, Persians, Romans, and more throughout history (Okay buddy)

But the sto♉ry of Yasuke is where Ubisoft has taken things too far???

Yeah, I'm thinking it's not "Historical Ac🍸curacy" that𓃲's the problem here roflmao