I thought it was one of the more inspired quests in t𓄧he game. Especially on subsequent playthroughs where I didn't worry as much about court approval.
As you say, it's not perfect and I feel like some of the weirder tasks could have been left out. Especially as they don't add anything to 𒉰the narrative or much 🥀to that particular quest.
This was rea🌃lly a quest that made it feel like my Inquisitor was more integral to this world than taking over a keep or tackling my 7th dragon.
Often times, when people complain about censorship it's usually argued that the game the developer intended is having content altered by an outside agency. The irony is t🥃hat 90% of them will go on to downloa🌠d mods that reduce or remove clothing or add more blood. So it's bad if a developer alters their game but it's a crime against consumers if they don't allow modding?
My Posts(2)
Dragon Age: Inquisition's Most Divisive Quest Got Me Back Into The Game
I thought it was one of the more inspired quests in t𓄧he game. Especially on subsequent playthroughs where I didn't worry as much about court approval.
As you say, it's not perfect and I feel like some of the weirder tasks could have been left out. Especially as they don't add anything to 𒉰the narrative or much 🥀to that particular quest.
This was rea🌃lly a quest that made it feel like my Inquisitor was more integral to this world than taking over a keep or tackling my 7th dragon.
Silent Hill 2’s Character 𒈔Redesigns Are Bad But They’re Not Censorship
Often times, when people complain about censorship it's usually argued that the game the developer intended is having content altered by an outside agency. The irony is t🥃hat 90% of them will go on to downloa🌠d mods that reduce or remove clothing or add more blood. So it's bad if a developer alters their game but it's a crime against consumers if they don't allow modding?