Personally, I tౠhink Nintendo is makin🧜g a big mistake.

This system𓄧 was a sure fire win until ꦐthe prices and all the coverage in the world can’t sugarcoat that.

It really is a shame because the system looks great, the games look great- but between the prices, the “physical releases” just being keys for someꦬ games, and all ♔the nickel and diming won’t help.

No justification for these prices. Nintendo build such a perfect niche🉐 for themselves with the switch after t⛦he disaster of the Wii U, and it seems they forgot what got them back in the dance in the first place.

🍬Can’t wait to watch games 🦂journalists try and shill this.

its not held back.

The runs great an꧅d looks great in both docked an🍒d handheld. It’s a 10 year old game.

The game will be improved, but held b🅠ack is hyperb🧔ole.

If this is this site’🧸s idea of “games journalism”, you really should just change the name of theꦫ site.

its not the issue of how you wish to play the game, its the fact that this is what is cons📖idered “content” for this site.

Sometimes, the less you say the better it is.

I’ll be as respectful as possible as well. First of all, the villa guard has a story isn’t mu🐎ch of a defense. The original Mario had a st𒅌ory also and that’s not what people remember.

id rather play a game shooting for the moon than something that is so aggress🀅ively mediocr𓄧e. I’ve played barebones action games for decades, so the story and writing has to hold up.

maybe paying ful💧l price for mediocrity is ok for you, but if your only defense was dragon age was good because it was ok, youꦛr starting on a pretty awful premise.

Nothing compared to Anthems flight and moment to moment explo꧟sions when it came out. If that gamꦡe was released as a single player rpg without the live service, it would have been spectacular.

expect more from your g🅘ames. Be a better gamer before calling out others.