As the person at the center of this article, I want to provide some much-needed context.&🍬nbsp;It'♒s shocking that the author never reached out to me for comment. A fair and balanced investigative journalist would have done so.

The article presents a one-sided view of a complex situation. It fails to mention the repeated harassmeꦉnt I've received from toxic fans, including accusations of being a "Zionist" – a term I embrace in its classic definition of supp🐬ort for Jewish self-determination in their ancestral homeland. This has been an ongoing issue for months, and this incident needs to be understood within that context.

The article also omits my revised response to the initial complaint, focusing instead on a *deleted* tweet that w💖as poorly worded and intended as sarcasm. My actual, considered response can be found by searching "itsamike 1889836132466303176"

As you can see, I explicitly told the fan base *not🔯* to harass the person. Conflating this incℱident with my support for Zionism, a legitimate political viewpoint, is a disingenuous attempt to further the narrative against me.

I believe in open dialogue, but the constant harassment and misrepresentation need to stop. A fair and balanced report would have included my perspective, acknowledgedꦇ the history of this issue, and accurately represented my view✃s.

I've also 🌌addressed this situation in more detail on X. Search for "itsamike 1890🐠220163032809651"