Regardless of the other parts of the article, let me first point out a significant logical flaw. The article attempts to argue that "sales aren't a metri▨c for quality because that would mean Resident Evil 5 is the best in the series." However, this argument is clearly proble🤪matic.

Sales should be evaluated through ho💯rizontal comparison. It is entirely natural for a game series to see an increase in sales due to platform growth, the expansion of the player base, and changes in the era. Gamers are well aware of this and would not use Resident Evil 5's sales alone to assert its standing in the series.

On the other hand, Wukong is the best-selling game of the year. Even without mentioning its 96% positive review rate on Steam, the sheer sales figures alone are sufficient to prove its success. Sales represent a direct acknowledgment from the market of a game's quality and impact. They are an essential criterion for evaluating a game's success, reflect⛦ing not only monetary investment from players but also its cultural influence. To dismiss the importance of sales is to ignore this reality.