You don't see the issue here. He said in the first part that "there were no black people in Bohemia", the official account also posted that "Henry is straight". Now they went back on both points tꦰhey vehemently defended ꦫin KCD1.

"Gamergaters" don't exist either. 🐻There are just ones who don't want to be preached to by games, there are some that don't like woke content at all and there are people just being "angry" because they trusted Warhorse and got disappointed. If you went to a restaurant that promised something and then sold you a meal you didn't like, you maybe are inclined to leave an online review. That's all it is. There is no activism in Yelp and similar sites.

There were homosexual characters in KCD1, multiple in fact. It's not very acc𝐆urate in this period. Nobody complained. It's just strange to change a character that's pre-written and the develoಞpers themselves called straight. Nobody complained about BG3, nobody complained about cyberpunk, nobody complained about mass effect... why? Because it's a different thing to be able to create a character and play however you like. It's a different to change an established character in a way you went on all barricades about it in the first part, before you sold your studio to some huge investors. One of them being Blackrock, the creator of the ESG scores for investments.

Gamergate wasn't even about game content. It was about good reviews in return for "favors". That's also what "ᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚGamergate 2🌌" is about. Media outlets reviewed games too highly, supposedly to keep publishers happy to get future early review codes. That has a huge influence on sales, is unfair to the customer and completely blocks out all other reviewers who are reviewing a game honestly. Without review codes, those major outlets would be irrelevant. Nobody wants a review after release, so they're required to keep the publishers happy. This just breeds corruption.