I think you're spot on.

Switch was such a big success; and game producers for the Switch have done such a great job of making games that run well on it, that a tech like myself might be like "Huh, look at those higher specs." Get excited about the possibilities, wh𝕴at games may come on it in the future and how existing games (especially ones that got the visuals scaled down a bit for the Switch) can be upgraded to look bett𓆏er on Switch 2, and new games with better visuals can come out on it as well.

Someone who just wants to play the games sees "Well, I have a Switch, there's very few Switch 2 exclusive games since several of the Switch 2 games will also run on the Switch." Many games are not using a photorealistic art style, I mean if you have a cartoon style then high res textures and lighting effects don't even fit in with the visual style let alone end up being important. I saw one of the Pokemon games and wondere🧜d "What the heck is going on with the ground, it's so blurry!" (honestly it does look heinous, it looks like it's u🦂sing about a 320x200 texture then just scaling it up, extremely blurry and indistinct... but other than the floor, you're usually not like 3 feet away from a wall or anything so it otherwise looked "OK"). But those playing and enjoying Pokemon don't give a care.

And, on my desktop with a GTX1650 I'm in the same boat -- the more graphically intensive or just plain bloated games, I turn the settings down to medium or low and enjoy the game instead of worrying about having inferior visuals 𓆏(.... unless it totally screw up the lighting, then I may have to suck it up and turn up that one option.)

Yeah really, I guess that's not as bad as it could be, but it does look distinctly like one of t🎐he demos (from like 15 years ago) where they'd be like "Look! 3D rendered hair!" to show off bump mapping, tesselation, etc. that were new at the time.

I do find this a bit hilarious. But, you know, it's not unrealistic, people do fart now and then and more likely when they'👍re squatting. As they say, if it seems like it's happening too often I could see nerfing it a bit.

Hold on yearly web pass? So it's subscription on web too?. Then maybe it's less surprise i♎t's also subscription on Steam. I don't know, I've actually never heard of this game. To be honest if a game is that sinple and in browser, I would probably not bother with a steam version (and apparently most others aren't either LOL.)

Why would they adjust their lifestyle🌸? The Switch 2 is an upgrade to the Switch (which is already being unused) with a single exclusive game. It's totally sensible to wait until there's more games, and possibly be able to get it at a lower price at that point.

I mean, the set conditions, show conditions, etc. the complaint is legitimate. But to me, it doesn't sound like "You got injured, here's $1,000 compensatღion". It sounds to me like he got $1,000 in cards to help tide things over while workers comp, legal settleme✃nt, etc, work their way through which after all will take a bit of time. I'm not some Mr Beast fan, to be clear, it just seems like an awfully negative take on something that I think was done to be nice.

(If it comes out later that they were planning on the $1,000 in cards to be full compensation... well obviously that's another matter ent🌠irely. 🍸I just don't think that's the case.)