Why Is Capcom Being Weird About Dead Rising's Removal Of Erotica Points?

By 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Tessa Kaur

Published Aug 15, 2024

Followed

Summary

Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster is pretty faithful to the original, but has removed some things that are clearly because they would now be considered offensive.
Despite this, Capcom is saying that it's not because these things are offensive, it's because they're not necessary.
It's pretty obvious Capcom is just trying not to alienate its anti-woke audience while still removing offensive content, and trying to straddle both sides will only annoy everyone.

By all accounts, the 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dead Rising Deluxe Remaster is very faithful to the 2006 original. 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:More of a remake than a remaster, the upcoming release sticks closely to its vision while updating and improving its core gameplay mechanics to make it feel more modern. Our own George Foster called it most faithful remake yet 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:in his preview, keeping all of the small details that earned it its following while overhauling visuals and environments and adding quality of life improvements. So far, so goo🐲d.

Not everything from the original made it to the remake, though. We’ve known since the reveal that psychopath 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Larry Chiang has been redesigned, c𓄧hanging him f🐟rom a blatantly racist caricature of an Asian man to a more racially ambiguous figure that looks like a typical butcher. We also know that Cheryl will have a less revealing outfit, which made the usual suspects, predictably, cry censorship.

Now, we also know that the remake will no longer reward 💝you for taking risque photos. Th🌌e “Erotica” photography category, which would previously give Frank experience points and a nosebleed, has been removed entirely, and missions where the category was mandatory have been tweaked to accommodate the change.

Capcom has🔥 just , in which it explains its bizarre rationale for doing so. The company says the category wasn’t removed “as a response to a changin🌟g cultural climate”, but because it was unnecessary, “not an appropriate reward for survival”, and “not a skill required of a journalist trying to stay alive for the next 72 hours during a zombie apocalypse”. It then clarifies that players can still take those photos if they want, they just won’t receive extra points for doing so.

Was Dead Rising’s Erotica Category Bad?

There are some very valid arguments against the removal of this category, but they requir♕e a little context to understand. Dead Rising’s protagonist, Frank West, is a photojournalist who often capitalises on the sensationalist, the horrifying, and the salacious. You can get points for not just Erotica, but Brutality (violence), Drama (self-explanatory), Horror (loads of zombies and gore), and Outtake (the funny and bizarre).

Dead Rising’s commentary arises from how Frank dehumanises his subjects, reducing them to objectives that will garner him as many points as possible, barely recognising the awful things he’s photographing. You could make the argument that removing this category lessens the impact of the commentary by removing an intentionally unsavoury aspect of the game. You could also make the argument that the commentary still exists without Frank taking creepshots of living and zombified women.

It’s also worth noting that you don’t get points for taking pictures of men’s bulges – the points are very explicitly gendered to incentivise pictures of women. I’d argue a good alternative would ha﷽ve been to keep the mechanic and make it gender agnostic.

You could also ma🌳ke the argument that this is a loss for game preservation, but you can still buy the 2016 remaster with the m🌄echanic intact, so that’s an irrelevant line of logic. The category is certainly less cut and dry than ‘objectification bad’, is my point.

Don't Defend Valve For Its Deadlock 'Leak'

If the company wanted Deadlock to 🅠be a secret, it wouldn’t have thousands of players.

Posts 5

Why Won’t Capcom Be Straight About Its Reasons?

However, Capcom doesn’t say any of this in its statemen🉐t about the category’s removal. Instead, it tries to make a case about shots of zombie tatas not ꧑being essential to Frank’s goal. Well, it’s not, but neither are funny masks on zombies, right?

The company seems to be trying to straddle two sides – the kind of people who think incentivised sexual objectification in games is in poor taste and shouldn't be implemented in modern games, even remakes, and the kind of people who quite enjoy it. It removed the category, made Cheryl less overtly sexy, and swapped out a racist caricature, but then denied that it was because of a “changing cultural climate” where that stuf✅f 🍷doesn’t fly so easily anymore.

I’m not saying that these changes are bad, nor am I saying that I want Capcom to release a statement saying it’s trying to be more woke or whatever. But it’s pretty cowardly to make changes very obviously geared towards making a game more politically correct by contemporary standards, and then appeal to an an൲ti-woke crowd by talking around the reasons why.

Capcom isn’t unique in its reluctance to address the growing anti-PC movement in gaming – just last month, Ubisoft released 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:an equally confounding statement about racists blasting Assassin’s Creed Shadows online that 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:didn’t sᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ⁤⁤⁤⁤ᩚ𒀱ᩚᩚᩚa🌌y the crucial thing: racism is bad. In trying to align themselves with modern moral standards while simultaneously trying not to alienate gamers who get up in arms♍ every time they see a game with any sort of diversity, these studios release statements that say nothing of substance, obfuscate the truth, and annoy people on both sides. These changes aren’t that big a deal, but corporate cowardice is.