Champions Tactics: Grimoria Chronicles is finally out! What's that you ask? You've never heard of Champions Tactics: Grimoria Chronicles? That's weird, it's a big, new release from Ubisoft, one of the biggest publishers in the world. Surely they could scrounge up a marketing budget! Why would they send it out to die like th — Oh, it's an NFT game, never mind.
The I can find for the game is from September of last𒁃 year. It doesn't explicitly mention its NFT ties, but the ending splash screen features the logo for Oasys, a company that advertises itself as "The Ultimate Gaming Blockchain."
EA's "Epic" AI Creation Tool Is Nobody's Future
Imagination to Cr💯eation makes a shooter out of cardboard boxe🌊s, but probably can't make much else.
You'd be forgiven for having never heard of it, though: despite being the announcement of a new Ubisoft game, the trailer has less than 30,000 views at time of writing. Compare that to the reveal trailers for Prince of Persia:🅷 The Lost Crown (), Star Wars O♏utlaws (), or even Just Dance VR: Welcome to Dancity (), and it's clear that Champions Tactics was not getting Ubisoft's full marketing blitz. Almost like it wanted it to go under the radar.
NFTs Return In Ubisoft's Champions Tactics
Now that it's out, it's clear why. The game is a full-on Blockchain release — complete with 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:an in-game figure that sel♓ls for nearly $64,000 — at a time when tech bros have fully moved on from tokens, however fungible, in favor of generative AI. Whether AI ends up being a flash in the 🦋pan remains to be seen, but we can definitively say that NFTs are dead.
As a result, Champions Tactics is dead, too. The game could be great otherwise — though no one will ever play it so it's hard to measure its merits as a multiplayer game — but being tied up in a wave that crashed years ago has doomed it from go. Though this is an extreme case, it's just the latest example of trend chasing dooming a game to failure in an era when games take years longer to make than most trends are ♐likely to last.
This year has been full of failures just like it. 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Suicide Squad: Kill the Justic𓂃e League arrived in January and instantly fell off a cliff. Though the live-service game was designed to have a long tail, its concurrent players. Concord was a similar case. The first-party PlayStation hero shooter exited its beta period to just — at least on Steam. It may have had more on PS5, but that information isn't publicly available. Sony promptly 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:deleted it from existence and, this week, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:shut down developer Firewalk Studios.
Both of these games had clearly failed out of the gate. Not because games haven't recovered from rocky launches in the past. Recent gaming history is full of examples, like 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:No Man's Sky, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Final Fantasy 14, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Star Wars: Battlefront 2, and 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Fallout 76, that were hated upon release but, thanks to a dedicated developer and/or supportive publisher, managed to thoroughly turn things around. Maybe Sony could see the writing on the wall before Concord launched, could see that the beta wasn't🦂 doing big numbers, could see that in the current market only one or two live-service games could break out in a given year.
Trend Chasing Doesn't Work When The Trend Has A Five-Year Head Start
Whatever the case, Champions Tactics, Suicide Squad, and Concord are all the s𒉰ad end results of ill-advised attempts at chasing trends in the modern era. Rushing a game to reach a release date has always been a bad idea. Attempting to hit shelves in time for Christmas 1982 was the reason the NES E.T. game, which started development in July of that year, was so notoriously bad. And that game's failure helped crash the games industry. But lengthening development cycles have made this even worse. How are you going to know what will be popular three, four, or even five years from now? What are the chances it will be the same thing thaꩵt's popular now?
Pretty slim. Some genres have endured and maintained popularity. First-person shooters and platformers have never ceased to have an audience — though in both cases, the games, and the audience, have evolved with time. But the live-service space quickly reached a point🐻 of oversaturation, and NFTs were wildly controversial from the beginning, before flaming out spectacularly in the end. It's tough to know which trends have legs and which will be gone by the end of the year. Which is why developers should be given the freedom to mꦦake what fits their interests and strengths, not shoehorned into whatever genre currently seems like a smart bet to executives.
Blizzard’s New AI Art Tool Is A Death Knell F♚or Creativity
Blizzard will be ♔using AI to꧙ generate concept art for future games. That sucks.
