reಞcent𓂃ly revealed that the first thing studios turn to these days when deciding whether or not to greenlight a movie is the director’s previous scores on Rotten Tomatoes.

The article was, overall, abou🍨t how it’s never been easier for a filmmaker to end up in “director jail.” If you’re not familiar with the term, it basically means what it sounds like it means. It’s when a director makes a movie that flops — at the box office and/or with critics — and loses out on future opportunities to direct feature films because of it.

This is something that has happened all throughout Hollywood’s history. Buster Keaton continued to perform for dec꧒ades after his 1929 directorial effort Spite Marriage, but the silent star never helmed another film before his death in 1966.

Babylon: Brilliant? Or Big-Budget Blunder?

Fans worried that this fate would befall Damien Chazelle after his Hollywood epic Babylon (set during the same period of film industry upheaval that saw Keaton fall out of fashion) flopped at the box office and divided critics. Chazelle stoked the flames when, , he stat🧔ed that he didn’t think he’d get access to a budget at Babylon’s $80 million scale again anytime soon. That worry proved to be for naught when, during CinemaCon, .

Jailed or not, Chazelle is a great example of the perils of entrusting decisions to a review aggregator like Rotten Tomatoes, since Babylon is far from universa✱lly disliked. It provokes strong reactions: some people love it, some people hate it, but review aggregators are not capable of accurately reflecting the split sentiment around divisive movies.

Margot Robbie being carried through a crowd at a party in Babylon

Babylon, which prompted raves and pans, got a Rotten score at . On the other hand, I don’t know anyone who loves Black Widow. It’s one of the shruggiest MCU movies, and was generally met with “Eh, it’s fine” responses from fans and critics. gave it a 7, gave it a three out of four, and gave it a B. Few pans, 𒁏few raves, the consensus was: meh. It has a — Certified Fresh.

This is the problem with review🎶 aggregators: they aggregate. They take the good, the bad, and the ugly and assign a percentage. The result is that a movie that no one feels especially passionate about, like Black Widow, can coast to a Fresh on the strength of being inoffensive, while a movie like Babylon, which inspires intense feelings in both directions, will skew toward negative because people who dislike it don’t dislike it a 7/10, a score RT counts ꦑas positive, they dislike it a 1/10, which lands it in Rotten.

Related
Babylon’s Box Office Fail⛦ure And The Dea✅th Of The Mid-Budget Movie

Movie stars aren't the box office 🃏draws that th🅷ey once were.

Rotten Tomatoes Rewards Less Interesting Movies

Rotten Tomatoes, then, as used in The Hollywood Reporter story, becoไmes a corporate cudgel against creatives making daring and distinct choices. Will your ambiguous ending alienate some viewers? Rotten Tomatoes won’t like that. Will your movie’s crass sense of humor irk some critics? Better tone it down or your RT percentage might dip. Rotten Tomatoes, by definition, favors what works for the crowd, and aiming for the broadest possible audience is no way to make interesting art.

It’s part of the reason that it’s been surprising to see recent Marvel movies dip into the Rotten zone. These are factory-made films, precisely fabricated to engi൩neer a certain response from fans (and many critics who are assigned these reviews are chosen because they’re just that: fans of the long-running franchise). The failing fortunes of movies like Ant-Man & The Wasp: Quantumania and Eternals tells us something that Hollywood execs may not want to hear: there are no safe bets. Audiences want to see things that wow them, and that can come from anywhere — even a director whose last project bombed.

Comeback narratives are only exciting when the hero has somewhere to come back from. Today's "what have you done for me lately?" mindset probably would mean Robert Downey, Jr. missing out on playing Iron Man.

Assembly line entertainment and auteurist experiments may both be met by the dreaded green splat. And if that&rsq🐷uo;s the case, why give it any weight at all? Make art, make entertainment, but don’t try to game an aggregator. Celebrity ꧒stylist Karla Welch says that when she dresses someone, she wants to end up on the best dressed list or the worst dressed list. Not making either, not being interesting, is the only way to fail. And yet it’s that down-the-middle, drab entertainment that Rotten Tomatoes is designed to reward.

Next
Margot Robbie Sho🥀uldn’t Becoꦰme The Toy Movie Producer After Barbie

Margot Robbie is set to produce a Monopoly movie after Barbie, but it would be a bummer for ওthis to become her niche.