TheGamer

Larian Studios Doesn’t Need Baldur’s Gate 4

By 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Tessa Kaur

Published Mar 22, 2024

Followed

Much to the disappointment and despair of fans everywhere, ’ CEO Swen Vincke announced during a talk at GDC that not only will the studio 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:not be making Baldur’s Gate 4, but it has even 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:cancelled an expansion to 2023’s unexpected breakout cRPG hit and Game of the Year winner. While a different studio might take on the gargantuan task of following up on the game’s medium-changing success, Larian will be moving on to something else. It’s unclear right now if that’s going to be a third Divinity game or something else entirely.

I was surprised that reading this news didn’t upset me even a bit. While ✅I’ve dreamt about what Baldur’s Gate 3 DL𒅌C could look like, , especially since it seems 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:the studio do🤪esn’t really wa𒀰nt to. And while I’m sure a Larian-made Baldur’s Gate 4 would have been amazing, Baldur’s Gate 3 already had such a monumental impact on the industry&rs🐟quo;s understanding of what video games could look like that it would be hard to live up to fan expectations for yet another genre-shaking revelation of a game.

Larian itself was filling some big shoes developing Baldur’s Gate 3, as the last two w🍌ere critical darlings helmed by the iconic and beloved BioWare.

It’s important to remember that Baldur’s Gate 3 propelled Larian to levels of fame that nobody could have predicted. Vincke himself said that the studio was jus෴t hoping to recoup development costs, and had 𒆙n♐o idea the game would be such a runaway success. While it was known for its prowess in cRPG development because of the Divinity series, the reputation it has now is incomparable to its status before Baldur’s Gate 3’s release.

In fact, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:while Hasbro may claim that Baldur’s Gate 3’s success shows that people want more “great” Dungeons & Dragons games, I’d propose that the opposite is true: the video game actually introduced more people to D&D than it drew from that demographic. It’s true that the IP opened doors for the studio, but now the door🥂s are fully ajar. The game stands on its own merits, and people aren’t crediting the D&D system, they’re creditingꦰ Larian. There is no better time than now for Larian to work on something new.

Minthara from Baldur's gate 3 with a faded filter over the picture

Larian's Changes To Minthara Indicate Deeper Flaws

It’s a sign of character underdevelopment when nobody ca♔n agree wꦐhat’s in character

Posts ♐168澳洲幸🌳运5开奖网:

The fact is that working with IP owned by an outside entity can be difficuꦜlt. In many ways, it necessarily and inherently limits creative freedom. A studio may have to work within canon, get approval from the owners of the IP, and have to operate entirely within constraints imposed on it. It has to work with or against preconceived notions of whaꦿt can and can’t happen within this setting. It can innovate and iterate, of course – Larian has proved that many times over – but there are rules to follow.

Separating with IP means that Larian can now capitalise on its newfound, extravagant levels of influence to create something new and unique to it. If it doesn’t have to follow someone else’s rules, it can take the skills it developed and the systems it’s now widely beloved for to create something entirely new instead of trying to surpass the standard it's set in the Baldur’s Gate series. There is no better time than now for Larian to move on, and I am so glad it made that choice. Whatever comes next, players have faith in Larian to make something incredible.