Is Dragon Age's Lack Of A Single Canon Sustainable?

By 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Tessa Kaur

Published Jul 30, 2024

Followed

doesn’t have a canon world state. It also won’t have the 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dragon Age Keep, which was previously used to save world states across the game𝔉s in the series, but you’ll still be customising your speci꧂fic world state in character creation by answering questions about the specific choices you’ve made in other games.

Game director John Epler says that ౠthere isn’t one enforced canon in🌊 The Veilguard. There has to be a canon when it comes to external media like comics and TV shorts, but when it comes to the games, “it’s your own canon”. Dragon Age is an epic, and your decisions reverberate throughout the whole series – The Ve💝ilguard might be putting the Keep out of commission in favour of having this decision-making native to the games rather than an external tool, but it’s certainly not taking away the repercussions of what you’ve already done.

You have to respect BioWare’s commitment to maintaining this central mechanic. It would have been far easier not to. I shudder🐼 to imagine how many possible branching outcomes could result from a single decision, let alone three games worth of decisions that also have impact🐼s on each other and that evolve across time.

Fallout: London Is Maki❀ng Me Desperate For Another N💟ew Vegas

The British capital has seen better d🐭ays, but it looks inꦗcredible in this new mod.

Posts 168澳洲幸运5开奖网: ﷽ ൩

We’ve already seen how our decisions in and Dragon Age 2 carry over to . Some 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:major examples: the ruler you crown in Origins’ Landsmeet appears throughout the series, the way you play Hawke in Dragon Age 2 affects how they act 🃏in Inquisition, Dagna from Origins also shows up in Inquisition and reflects your choices from the first game, and Morrigan’s child (if she has one) can also appear in Inquisition.

It’s hard to say right now how many of your choices in Inquisition will affect what happens in The Veilguard, but this is one area where I don’t doubt that The Veilguard will shine. It’s a crucial part of the game, so I&rsq꧙uo;m sure that the C𒈔ouncil, the group of superfans BioWare consulted, would have objected if it wasn’t up to par.

But I can’t help but wonder how sustainable this is. If you drew out a tree of every possible decision made in every game, the outcomes made possible because of those decisions, and the situations that could arise from each… well, it would be a knotted, impossibly big tree. Narratively, this kind of flexibility is a massive boon for plﷺayers, but increꩲdibly hard to maintain for developers. What makes this even more complex is that BioWare doesn’t look so much at overall world states as individual choices, which means a kind of granularity you don’t often see in series of this size.

How long before BioWare has to start pruning that tree, tossing aside exist🍸ing factors in order to manage a realistic scope? Has it already had to begin doing that? Will pl💮ayers start to question why decisions they felt were important have seemingly been ignored in the service of managing complexity?

It must have been difficult enough to keep this up for three games, let alone four. I꧒f there’s eventually another title added to the series after The Veilguard, it’s hard to imagine that the complex individual canon every player has developed over the games can continue to be just as complicated and choice-reliant. Things will have to be tossed out, just to make the series coherent. I love BioWare’s commitment, but I’m not sure that it can last foreveౠr.