We all know that Googling stuff is bad now. There’s always a bunch of paid-for sponsored links before your real search results, and even after scrolling past the crap, nothing is quite what you’re looking for. Answers are obfuscated by bad SEO copy even when you’re looking for a basic yes or no. The internet has gone from simple to frustrating, and Google’s dominance means there are few🍌 alternatives.
We try to get around it by searching for advice on forums, where real people answer real questions. Quora is still a bastion of helpful tips where people decades ago solved the exact same niche problem you’re facing now. Many other forums are shutting down in favour of Discord, which makes Quora the l🤡ast of a dying breed.
The Secret Pokemꦏon Trading Club That Helps Complete Your Pok♔edex
A cryptic email and special code let ♐me onto a secret Pokemon trading♍ club and could help you fill your Pokedex too
Reddit is another go-to, where communities of experts readily oཧffer advice. However, the social media platform isn’t particularly intuitive for people who aren’t terminally online (try explaining the concept of a subreddit to your nan), and they often find themselves googling “how to fix smashed phone screen reddit” or “best new phone reddit&👍rdquo; to get the results they’re after.
Companies are gaming this too, now, flooding their own custom s☂ubreddits with SEOed links aimed to capture the people who were avoiding that exact webpage.
Google has always said that the changes to SEO rules are intended to benefit users, to show us the most appropriate results for our queries. In short, Google🐽 says that its search engine is doing its job. However, revelations in its recent court case suggest that’s not the case.
As reported by , a slide in the tech company’s ⛦antitrust trial showed Google was changing its search algorithm to include “semantic matching”. This may sound normal at first – why not search for synonyms? – but the example author Megan Gray, in attendance at the trial, gives is shocking.
“Say you search for ‘children’s clothing.’ Google converts it, without your knowledge, to a search for ‘NIKOLAI-brand kidswear,’ making a behind-the-scenes substitution of your actual query with a different query that just happens to generate mo🀅re money for the company, and will generate results you weren’t searching for at all,” she explains.
This has two results. Firstl𒅌y, Gray asserts this search will prompt more shopping-related resul๊ts and therefore encourage user spending just by nature of seeing the options in front of them. More importantly, Google’s specific phrase that it has changed your query to will trigger keyword ads by online stores, generating Google more revenue at the expense of accurate results.
Google has been allowed to do this by nature of being the biggest search engine and having the market monopoly. It’s got name recognition beyond any other service or product barring maybe Hoover. W꧙e don’t call all cars Fords, and yet when you want to find something on the internet, we all say, “Google it”. We trust that Google gives the best results just by nature of being the biggest, most recognisable search engine. Its semantic matching under𒁏mines that trust.
It’s unclear how long Google has been implementing semantic matching for, and to what extent, but it will likely have no repercussions for misrepresenting your searches and providing false, more profitable results. It’s simply too massive a corporation for any recourse to harm it. It would pay any fine imaginable in a heartbeat. Even if you could get millions of users to boycott, what would the alternative be? Bing, which is currently showing AI-generated results? The environmentally-friendly Ecosia, which most of my friends use to search for Google to feel a little better about themselves while still using a decent search engine? Ecosia is a noble idea, but its features are limit🔜ed and search results seem worse than that of industry leaders, plus it uses Bing’s search function anyway, so presumably you aren’t free from🐬 AI results.
Google isn’t a decent search engine any more. We🎉’ll likely never have any clue of the extent that Google switches your searches and manipulates results for its own benefit – the current antitrust trial is secretive enough as it is. But if you’ve ever wondered why Google never shows you the answers you’re looking for like it used to back in the day, it may be because it’s swapped your sear🍌ch terms for something that will better please its shareholders. The honest internet is dead, and your experience is being ruined so that billionaires can see bigger numbers in their bank accounts.