Summary

• Druids are too outdoorsy for my taste, and living nomadically may not be sustainable in the long term.
• Barbarians may be too rugged, and meeting their entire clan might be daunting.
• Warlocks could prioritize their supernatural entity over you, making competition for attention tough.

The 12 core 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dungeons & Dragons classes are extremely diverse, mostly in terms of the skills they offer and the overall flavor they add to any character concept. Bꦺut, they're also extremely different in terms of how badly I would want to date them. After all, we have to admit it might be a bit diffeಌrent dating a barbarian as opposed to a wizard.

So, what's the definitive ranking of dateability in the Dungeons & Dragons classes? Well, we're about to find out with this definitive list, which has obviously been carefully researched. Here's every DND class ranked by🥂 how fun they'd be to date.

12 Druid

Too Outdoorsy For My Taste

This first class on the list comes down to my personal taste. If I can be quite honest with you all, I'm not much of𝕴 an outdoors person, and if you're reading a list about Dungeons & Dragons classes, my guess🐻 is neither are you.

At the end of the day, while I have nothing against druids, I'm not really interested i🍸n living nomadically. It would never work out between us long-term. Though I'm sure you'd get the best bouquets from dating a druid.

11 Barbarian

I'm Not Ready To Join A Clan

Believe it or not, a little too rough and tumble for my taste. Plus, everyone knows that meeting your partner's family can be the worst. What hap🌟pens if yꦰou have to meet their entire clan?

Frankly, as an indoor kid too, I don't think I would really attract a barbarian, or impress their cꩵlan in any way, shape, or form. I think😼 we'd likely be better off as friends. Plus, that barbarian rage means that your fights would probably be a bit much to have to deal with.

10 Warlock

Three's A Crowd

Have you ever dated someone who was really clo𓆏se with a friend of theirs? Like really, really close, and it feels like maybe something is going on there? Now imagine that, but with a supernatural entity of eld𝓡ritch horror. That's what it'd be like to date a warlock.

I don't want to have to compete for attention with 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:their warlock patron𝕴. If we're going to be in a rela🌞tionship, I need to be the first priority, okay? Is that so much to ask?

9 Paladin

Would You Break Your Oath For Me?

A little too sanctimonious, perhaps. Not just because they're a religious f🧔igure, but those oaths feel like they could cause problems down the road. Dating someone who is principled is great. But, you don't have to be so serious about it all the time?

Paladins do get some bonus points for the whole 'knight in shining armor' thing.🏅 I mean, you'd 😼basically get to live out the fantasy of being rescued all the time.

8 Cleric

I Don't Think I Can Convert

Similarly to paladins, I'm not sure I want to date someone who's always going to be more focused on their deity than me. This also harkens back to the same complaint I have about warlocks. What if I want to hang out, but you▨ need to commune with your god?

However, similarly to paladins, there's something about dating someone with a suit of armor, a shield, and a crest that's very appealing. Plus, they could probably fix you with all 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:that healing magic.

7 Ranger

Are You A Pet Person?

I'm personally a big animal person, and rangers can be a bit more indoorsy perhaps, than a druid. I love the idea of dating someone who has a cute relat💝ionship with their pet. Howev🥃er, I do also worry that the animal might get defensive, especially depending on the type of animal companion they have.

After all, a ranger with a pet bird or dog; that's adorable! A ranger with a giant, vicious panthe🎐r at their side that's always giving you the stink eye? Less cute!

6 Fighter

Middle Of The Road

As is the case most of the time, fighters fall squarely in🌸 the middle of the road for me. While I think this is a great class, I'm not sure there are any specific pros or cons I can think of to dating them. They fight well, sure, but what's going on underneath all that ar🐈mor?

That being said, sometimes stability is the best thing in a partner, and fighters, writ large, seem relativ𓆏ely squared away. I don't think there would necessarily be any huge problems🌌 with fighters, but I'm not entirely seduced by the idea.

5 Monk

Good With Their Hands

They're gonna spend all their focus points on you. Now, on the more positive side of the list, I think th✱ere's something very appealing about dat🅰ing a monk who's good with their hands. Plus, they have unarmored defense, which means they probably don't have a ton of emotional walls up around them.

I will say there are probably 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:some monk subclasses that are better than others. Way of the long death doesn't sound likeꦺ an appealing person to date. Wayไ of the open hand, however, may be a different story.

4 Rogue

We Love Edginess

Okay, I have a confession to make. I am ad🐭dicted to edginess. The more dark and brooding someone is, the more likely I am to be attracted to them. And that's why rogues come close to scraping🐈 the podium in this list.

However, I realize that edginess isn't for everyone. And to that I say, 'What is wrong with you?' Rogues are deft, clever, and subtle, whic𒁏h are all great qualities in a partner. Plus, they could steal you gifts anytime, day or night, though preferably at nighꦛt.

3 Sorcerer

Metamagic My Heart

On the podium, we have sorcerers in the third-place slot. Frankly, I jus🥂t think full-casters would be the most fun to date. Plus, sorcerers are highly charismatic, meaning that they're likely to be able to woo you, even with🤡out the use of spells.

There's also something so attractive about the idea of so🅺meone naturally powerful, like a sorcerer. For me, it would really feel like dating upward. Sorcerers, you have the k♚ey to my heart always.