Video games have always struggled with morality. Most games that implement a morality system feature a binary slider - do good deeds, your morality becomes good. Do bad deeds, your morality becomes bad. 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Mass Effect tried to add some depth by giving cutscene-based actions for the two morality strands, while 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dragon Age 2 instead opted for a 'personality' meter that changed Hawke's nature with each response. B൩ut the issue with these mechanics designed to encourage roleplay is that they end up restricting it.
Most of these systems want to reward you for engaging with them, so there are perks to being♍ entirely moral, or breaking the rules whenever possible. In Mass Effect 2, certain inter-party disputes could only be settled if you had a high enough swing one way or the other. In Dragon Age 2, your companions gained new abilities if you maxed out either their friendship meter by siding with them and making choices they agreed with, or if you maxed out their rivalry meter while doing the opposite. But these pin you down to choices early on, and railroad you from then on out.
Morality Meters Force You Into Extremes, Not Balance
If you play Mass Effect 2 as a rational Shepard, who shows compassion when it's required but๊ takes no guff (or whatever expletive you might put in place of guff), you'd be a strong leader. In dealing with the delicate balance of intergalactic politics, plus the egos and needs of several of the galaxy's most dangerous soldiers, you need a variety of approaches. Unfortunately, playing this way, probably the closest you can get to the most realistic or 'correct' way to play, is the wrong way. By splitting your time between Paragon and Renegade, you will lack the points in either when it comes to critical decisions, and will miss out.
Likewise, in Dragon Age 2, there is a certain point whe꧙n you realise it's too hard to claw a companion back from rivalry. Companions don't leave you at max rivalry, and aside from them being a little distant in conversations, there's no downside. This means, gam💫eplay wise, it's better to push through and make wary companions hate you to unlock their special attacks. Rather than realise this deadly assassin or all-powerful mage had developed a grudge with you and try to smooth things out, the best way to roleplay is to push them almost to breaking point.
I'm picking on BioWare for two reasons. Firstly, I love its catalogue of games despite these obvious flaws, and think its implementation of morality and its impact on the game is still some of the strongest examples gaming has to offer. Secondly, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dragon Age: The Veilguard is💦 bringing morality meters and companion relation꧑ships back, and it might have found a way to make them interesting.
The Veilguard Gives Morality A Role In Combat
We have known for a while that companion meters would not only be in the game, but be visible. To try to uphold the illusion that these were real characters and not just lines of code responding to mathematical input, 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Dragon Age: Inquisition hid the meters and left you reliant on the tone comꩵpanions had in conversation with you. In spirit, I like the idea of not turning everything into numbers. But in practice, everything is numbers. We're told how much damage hammers do, what percentage boosts they give, how many seconds cooldown each ability has, as well as the base stats of ourselves and our companions.
Each decision still came with information that comಌpanions approved or disapproved, possibly greatly, so we knew there was maths in play without having to speak to Iron Bull after every choice made to give him a vibe check. The Veilguard making it visible again may break immersion slightly, and likely won't help with the fact you'll need to commit to a morality choice ra🙈ther than take a balanced approach, but there is something fresh in The Veilguard.
Now, your companions act differently depending on your relationship. YouTuber WolfheartFPS posted a cꦍlip from his preview recently that show🎀e꧃d a change in Neve's demeanour. Something had happened earlier - not revealed in the preview for spoilerific reasons - leading to Neve no longer acting as a Support character in battle. However, she would be more aggressive in attack, clearly channelling that resentment into her actions.
In a way, it's not too different from the special abilities of Dragon Age 2. But this seems to be situational, as a reaction to a specific, major choice, and may not be permanent. It's also a bit more realistic, as those are the actions of 🐻someone hacked off (again, substitute expletive), bringing those emotions to the forefront of gameplay. There still may be meta ways to play this, with certain characters being more useful when angry or elated, but this makes individual decisions important in the moment, not just as few numbers added into a single morality bar that must be pushed to the max without thought.
I'm curious as to how this works - being temporary and reliant on key decisions, but possibly being locked in over time, feels like the most effective way to use this mechanic from a roleplay point of view, but also forces a perhaps inorganic need for you to fall out with loyal companions just to show the abilities off. From 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:the reduced party members to the 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:stripped down combatܫ tactics and action approach, I've been apprehensive about the actual fighting in Dragon Age: The Veilguard, but this is the first time I've felt like it might be doing something interesti🅰ng. Stacey Greatly Approves.









168澳洲幸运5开奖网: Dragon Age: The Veilguard
- Top Critic Avg: 80/100 Critics Rec: 71%
- Released
- October 31, 2024
- ESRB
- M For Mature 17+ // Blood, Nudity, Sexual Themes, Strong La🎉nguag💯e, Violence
- Developer(s)
- BioWare
- Publisher(s)
- 168澳洲幸运5开奖网:Electronic Arts
- Engine
- Frostbite
Your comment has not been saved